| "These are our homelands." |
| "We are still here." |
| The statements are objectively true: The Timbisha Shoshone have lived in what's now popularly known as Death Valley for thousands of years. And they still live there, in a small village inside the national park that has about 30 full-time inhabitants. |
| In 2000, Congress officially recognized these two facts in the text of the hard-fought Homeland Act, which transferred nearly 7,800 acres of land, including the village site, back to the Timbisha Shoshone. |
| But federal officials have now taken issue with those seemingly innocuous sentences, according to Mandi Campbell, tribal historic preservation officer for the Timbisha Shoshone and a resident of the village. |
| |
| The rationale? Orders from President Trump and Interior Secretary Doug Burgum directing the National Park Service to review interpretive materials for content that the administration feels "inappropriately disparages Americans." |
| Only certain types of Americans, as it turns out: The executive order also has been cited in a lawsuit by the city of Philadelphia as the presumptive reason the NPS removed an exhibit on enslaved people from Independence National Historical Park. |
 |
| Participants take time out for a photo during a march organized by the Timbisha Shoshone to mark the 25th anniversary of the Homeland Act. (Kim Stringfellow) |
| And it's prompted Lowell National Historical Park in Massachusetts to stop showing films about women and immigrant textile mill workers, according to the New York Times, which also reported that plaques referencing climate change have been removed from Muir Woods National Monument in California and Fort Sumter and Fort Moultrie National Historical Park in South Carolina. |
| On top of that, Trump officials recently ordered the removal or editing of signs and other materials in at least 17 national parks in Arizona, Texas, Colorado, Utah, Montana and Wyoming, The Washington Post reports. |
| Back to Death Valley — a name that, by the way, members of the Timbisha Shoshone have never liked. Campbell told me that a celebration of the Homeland Act's 25th anniversary that took place Friday at the national park's Furnace Creek Visitor Center was supposed to include the unveiling of updates to its interpretive exhibit. The tribe had planned to place in a display case earrings and a medallion that members once gifted to former park Superintendent J.T. Reynolds to mark the passage of the act, along with some descriptive language, she said. |
| |
| Ahead of the event, the Park Service submitted the additions to its parent agency, the Interior Department, for review. Campbell said that agency officials replied that not only could the new exhibit not include the new phrases "these are our homelands" or "we are still here," but that similar language that's been on display since 2012 would also be placed under review. |
| Interior Department spokesperson Elizabeth Peace said this is not true. "The Department has a long-standing history of working closely with tribal partners as part of exhibit development and review, and the park was never told they could not use that specific language or phrases," she wrote in an email. |
| Peace went on to explain that although the new exhibit is under review pursuant to the executive and secretarial orders — both titled "restoring truth and sanity to American history" — the department hasn't made any final decisions. |
| The review, according to Peace, is meant to ensure that parks tell "the full and accurate story of American history," which includes addressing enslaved and Indigenous people, "informed by current scholarship and expert review, not through a narrow ideological lens." |
| So, the 25th anniversary celebration went ahead without acknowledging the ongoing debate about the new exhibit. |
| Keep up with California | Your support helps us deliver the news that matters most. Subscribe to the Los Angeles Times. | | | | | |
| There was a march from the village to the visitor center in which tribal members walked behind a banner that read, "We are still here," which, Campbell said, was meant to echo a protest staged on Memorial Day in 1996 in which the Timbisha Shoshone demanded the restoration of their homelands after negotiations with the federal government broke down. That rally was widely credited with restarting the talks that eventually led to the passage of the Homeland Act. |
| Three decades later, the struggle continues. "Why do we still have to fight to be heard?" Campbell wondered earlier this week. "We weren't even in history books. And we still can't tell our story. When do we get our chance?" |
| Despite the recent controversy, the tribe has a good relationship with the Death Valley-based NPS officials, Campbell said, and she's confident they'll be able to work through whatever happens next together. |
| After Friday's march, tribal council members and park officials gave a series of speeches at the visitor center saluting their strong partnership and all the work that it's taken to get to this point. Then they took pictures and ate cake. |
More recent land news |
| If you're a regular reader of this newsletter, you probably are aware of how lawmakers have been using the Congressional Review Act, which enables Congress to overturn recent federal rules with a majority vote, to revoke specific Bureau of Land Management plans that limit mining and drilling in specific places. This was unprecedented until last year but has since been used to throw out BLM plans in Alaska, Montana, North Dakota and Wyoming. |
| Now, a decision by the Government Accountability Office has cleared the way for Congress to throw out the BLM plan for Utah's Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument, which protects the land from mineral extraction, limits grazing and prioritizes conservation. Experts expect Republican Rep. Celeste Maloy or another Utah member of Congress to introduce a bill to do so this year, according to Caroline Llanes of Rocky Mountain Community Radio. If it passes, it would mark the first time the act has been used to roll back protections in a national monument. |
| Four former U.S. Forest Service chiefs are speaking out against the agency's move to repeal the Roadless Area Conservation Rule. The 2001 rule protecting 58 million acres of national forests from road building and logging was supported by both political parties, and is needed to protect sensitive wildlife and maintain clean drinking water, argues an op-ed published in the Hill. |
| The Forest Service has revised its oil and gas leasing rules to "streamline" the permitting process by replacing parcel-by-parcel environmental reviews with a broader review that can sometimes cover millions of acres, reports Jake Bolster of Inside Climate News. Environmental groups told Bolster that the move will increase the likelihood that the agency misses sensitive habitat when deciding where to allow drilling. |
| Some environmental advocates are concerned about a new order from Interior Secretary Burgum that seeks to expand hunting and fishing access on federal public lands. "It flips conservation on its head and treats wildlife protection as the exception," said Michelle Lute, executive director of nonprofit Wildlife for All. Others say the directive is more of a statement of values than something that will result in drastic changes on the ground. "It's a nice nod to the hunting and angling community that acknowledges 'we know these areas mean a lot to you,'" said Ryan Callaghan, president and chief executive of Backcountry Hunters & Anglers. |
A few last things in climate news |
| Much has been made of a record-setting rainy season that's helped lift California out of drought. But an extraordinarily warm January has left the snowpack across the Sierra Nevada and much of the Western U.S. far smaller than usual, Times water and climate change reporter Ian James writes. That means more hard times for the snowmelt-fed Colorado River, which provides water for farms and cities across seven states. |
| A federal judge recently ruled that a wind project off the coast of New York state can go forward — the fifth time a court has ruled against the Trump administration's efforts to halt major offshore wind projects, write Jennifer McDermott and Alexa St. John of the Associated Press. Meanwhile, the administration has also been stymieing solar and wind energy projects on land by halting or delaying once-routine federal approvals, find Brad Plumer and Rebecca F. Elliott of the New York Times. |
| Peninsular bighorn sheep seeking to migrate back and forth across the California-Mexico border, as they've long done, are now being hampered by razor wire installed by U.S. Customs and Border Protection in the Jacumba Wilderness, according to our wildlife and outdoors reporter Lila Seidman. Similar scenarios are playing out across the Southwest, where the 1,954-mile border cuts through the habitat of more than 80 threatened and endangered species. |
| This is the latest edition of Boiling Point, a newsletter about climate change and the environment in the American West. Sign up here to get it in your inbox. And listen to our Boiling Point podcast here. |
| For more land news, follow @phila_lex on X and alex-wigglesworth.bsky.socialon Bluesky. |
More L.A. Times environmental stories |
| |
| |
| |
| |
